Interlink Media Publication

Copyright© 2010 by Source Interlink Magazines, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

ADVERTISING INFORMATION. Please call IMPORT TUNER MAGAZINE Advertising Department, 949/705-3100. Related publications: Classic Trucks, European Car, 4-Wheel Drive & Sport Utility, High Performance Pontiac, GM High Tech Performance, Hot Bike, Hot Rod, Lowrider, Lowrider Arte, Lowrider Girls, Mini Truckin', Muscle Mustangs & Fast Fords, Off-Road, Popular Hot Rodding, Street Rodder, Super Chevy, Surfing, Truckin', Vette, and other specialty magazines.

REPRINTS. Contact Wright's Media @ 877.652.5295 (281.419.5725 outside the U.S. and Canada) to purchase quality ci m reprints or e-prints of articles appearing in this publication.

To order back issues, log onto www.simbackissues.com , or write to SIM Back Issues, 2900 Amber Lane, Corona, CA 92882. Cost: $7.00 each, plus $3.00 shipping and handling per issue (International order - add $10 per order) and applicable sales tax in your area. Special and/or Collector's issue pricing may vary, check website for latest pricing. Please specify magazine and issue date. If this is not specified, your check/money order will be returned to you. Allow 3-4 weeks for delivery.

Editorial contributions are welcomed but editors recommend that contributors query first. Contribution must be accompanied by return postage and we assume no responsibility for loss or damage thereto. Manuscripts must be typewritten on white paper, and all photographs must be accompanied by captions. Photo model releases are required of all persons in photos. Import Tuner reserves the right to use material at its discretion, and we reserve the right to edit material to meet our requirements. Upon publication, payment will be made at our current rate, and said payment will cover the author's and contributor's rights of the contribution. Contributor's act of mailing contribution shall constitute and express warranty that the material is original, and does not infringe on the rights of others. Mail contributions to: Import Tuner, 1733 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92606. This magazine is purchased, by the buyer, with the understanding that the information is from various sources from which there can be no warranty or responsibility by Source Interlink Companies or the publisher as to the legality, completeness and accuracy of said content.

Occasionally, our subscriber list is made available to reputable firms offering goods and services that we believe would be of interest to our readers. If you prefer to be excluded, please send your current address label and note requesting to be excluded from these promotions to Source Interlink Media, LLC., 831 S. Douglas St., El Segundo, CA 90245, Attn: Privacy Coordinator.

Any submissions or contributions from readers shall be subject to and governed by Source Interlink Media's User Content Submis; http://privacy.sourceinterlinkmedia.com/submissions.html.

m Terms and Conditions, which are posted al

GDinGPDSTRL

YOU SHOOT US, WE SHOOT BACK

SEND PRESENTS TO:

IMPORT TUNER 1733 ALTON PARKWAY 1ST FLOOR IRVINE, CA 92606

[email protected]

WE'RE BEING CALLED OUT LEFT AND RIGHT THIS MONTH! FIRST, ON SOME DISCREPANCY REGARDING "FACT OR FICTION", THEN BECAUSE WE APPARENTLY DON'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN S-CHASSIS AND AN S 30, AND FINALLY BECAUSE SOME PEOPLE STILL FEEL THAT TUNING A CAR IS A BAD IDEA. SO HARSH, WE RESORT TO PWN-ING A GREEN AUTOMOTIVE PLAY ON WORDS JUST TO FEEL BETTER.

NICE ARTICLE, BUT...

To start, I love this magazine. I was reading the August '10 issue and came across the Fact or Fiction article where you reported that you can expect up to a 10.1-percent power/torque loss from having your A/C and stereo turned all the way up. I have to strongly disagree. Why would a car with more power lose more from the same modification than one with less power? Shouldn't the same A/C system take away the same amount of power from every engine? If you lost 11.5 hp in a 120hp 2.5i, shouldn't you also lose 11.5 hp in your 450hp 370Z example, not the 50 you projected? -Brendan Metz

Thanks for reading, Brandon. The first thing to remember about changing rotational mass is that resultant losses or gains occur as a percentage of the total amount produced—just the same as how drivetrains absorb a percentage of total power output by an engine (i.e. about 18 percent for a FWD vehicle, 22 percent for RWD due the added mass of a driveshaft, etc.). Shaving the same amount of weight off two different cars by, say, reducing the weights of their flywheels by the same amount will indeed improve power and torque by different amounts, but the same percentage. And so it goes with increasing parasitic loss with electric and A/C draw, all things being equal.

NICE ARTICLE, BUT.

Hello Import Tuner! I read your magazine regularly (as often as we can get it in the Middle East, at least), and I just caught the article of the Common Snapper 240Z (October '10). Awesome find! I own one myself—as well as a Z32— and it's nice to see some old-school love every once in a while. One point, though: the "Behind the Build" section states that the car has USDM 240SX fenders. It definitely has USDM fenders, but from a 240Z, not a 240SX. But you knew that already, I'm sure ;-) Keep up the good work! -DC2 Murphy

Via [email protected]

Doh!

NICE ARTICLE, BUT.

Just got finished with your October issue—love those Supras! I am a bit concerned about how the parts and dyno tests were done in Power Pages on the '10 EVO. First, you bolt on the HKS exhaust system and get a legit 20.8hp gain, which is awesome. Next is the DC sports intake, which appearsto gain 30.8 hp, but in fact, you turned up the boost to 26 psi and altered the fuel and ignition maps. I would say that most of the gain here was from the added boost and tuning, not the part being tested. Hardly a fair test. The final test was the DC Sports hard pipe kit, which, again, you added and then tuned to get a 6.3hp gain. I realize that tuning is a vital part of any build, but the real issue is that you show giant 30.8hp gains right beside the picture of the product, but the actual power gains were from adding boost and tuning. I guess DC Sports will be getting some 'I thought your intake made 30 hp on an EVO, and I only got 4 hp' phone calls from people who don't read the notes of your testing.

-Paul Durkin Via importtuner.com

We're sure this is a common concern among our readers, Paul, so thanks for writing in. The fact is that you answered the issue yourself—tuning is a vital part of upgrading today's newer platforms, so much so that we can't recommend upgrading many new vehicles without it. Tuning generally isn't needed with the addition of exhaust modification in turbo applications, but as for the point of raising boost at the intake stage, 26psi of boost was the "comfortable" setting our tuner recommended with the improvements in flow presented by the DC Sports intake. The alternative would've been for us to post minimal gains at each step (or possible losses—common in newer applications without tuning) and simply speculate how much power could be produced with tuning, but we felt it best our readers know how to maximize their gains.

NICE CAR, BUT.

We're looking to have our '92 Nissan Skyline GT-R put in your magazine with a full article with multiple pictures. We are in the process of collecting sponsorship in order to go to world-class shows such as SEMA and NOPI. We have attached some pictures to get a better idea of what the car looks like. This car was appraised at $160,000 and has numerous customizations and was rebuilt from the ground up.

Thank you for your time and consideration. -Erin and Trevor Via [email protected]

The engine mods appear to be sick. .. but the rest just makes us sick. We see where you're going with the whole "Godzilla" thing; we just wish you wouldn't go there. Why couldn't you have done this with a Civic?

0 0

Post a comment